Do you think he doesn't read this blog? Do you think he didn't see Manchurian Candidate?

I was speaking to someone recently who expressed something less than dismay at the thought that the dumber Presidential candidate might have arranged to have his own personal safety appear to be threatened.

A common error all of us make is we judge from what we know. You don't know what is available to Me. You don't know what technology is available to fake assassination attempts. You only know the guns you buy at the gun shop.

As I have explained before, the technology on your retail store shelf is 30 to 50 years behind what is available if you have the money and connections. Imagine if you had used our tax dollars to gain experience in operating the American military and the American clandestine disservices agencies for four years. Now you need to frame your own purported assassination attempt because you fear if the election must be won with brains, you will lose. You are using knowledge which you have garnered from your revolving door uncivil servant experience. You have an UNIMAGINABLE array of options.

We, the American taxpayers, CANNOT begin to imagine the depths to which people such as he will sink. You simply don't have the information to accurately evaluate their behaviour. Unfortunately, I do.

What really amazes Me, time and again, is how stupid all of you are. Not just dumb. Stupid. Incredibily stupid. Here's a tip or two.

One. Everytime you consume information regarding a report of a public event, ask yourself

1. Why am I putting this rubbish in my brain? (Answer. Because your brain is mostly rubbish.)
2. What does this report lead me to believe?
3. Why do they want me to believe that?
4. If I believe the obvious conclusion, who benefits?

Note, this is not as dispositive as logical discourse. The problem is humanity won't permit logical discourse because humans are herd animals.

Oftentimes, you will find that the person, people or organisations who ultimately benefit from the media you consume are the same as who or what initially appears to be the victim(s).

For example, most Americans thought the clandistine disservices complex took a devastating blow on 9/11. More than two decades later, we can see that no group, person or entity has benefited more from 9/11 than NSA & CIA shareholders, and people like Messrs Musk, Cheney, & Buffet. In case you are trying to again lay the blame at my feet, I don't own a single share. And I never will.

Naturally, at first glance, the person who is the victim is not presumed to be the perpetrator. First glance is never last glance. Once the dynamics have played out, the primary benefactor is oftentimes (in America, with the most widely circulated 'news', more often than not) the same person whom the information might have caused you to first believe was suffering the most.

I B M = i bowel movement

For example, for each and every PRC hack of an American PC, there are at least 100 hacks of PRC PCs. Better yet, most of the reported PRC hacks of American PCs are perpetratred by YOUR AMERICAN tax dollars, i.e. American clandestine disservices agencies pretending to be Chinese so they can steal American information, American intellectual property, American trade secrets, and funnel that datum to the clandestine disservices agencies own (socialised) client corporations and campaign donors.

This has been occuring for decades. The WWII Golden Triangle in Burma, where I was later born, was nothing new. This will continue as long as you are blind to the obvious. As long as you are willing to look the other way, and elect a man who is as corrupt as any President in American history. BII might have been the dumbest, but this guy is the most immoral.

HItler killed many fewer Russians than Stalin.

Every time you see Islamists beheading an Israeli soldier, what makes you think that the YouTube video was not choreographed and filmed in, and distributed from, Langley, Virginia? Only one thing causes you to see 'evil' Islamists. Your naivete. Your brainwashing. Your inability to question the obvious propaganda. Vietnam was the same. In 50 years have you learned nothing other than how to be better lambs to go to the slaughter?

The Abrahamic religions excel most at teaching Abrahamic supplicants to hate each other. Thou shalt not kill? I know few, if any Christians who have leaned that. Instead, their American nationalism has taught them that if they kill a Muslim, they get a paycheck from the US Government. Recently, I heard a Baptist pastor, from the pulpit, suggest that there might be no better way to find faith than war. He was alluding to war in the Middle East.

When the "Wild West" was being won, more American settlers died of gunshot wounds due to accidental firings of weapons than died at the hands of Ancient Americans, i.e. American Indians. Imagine trying to sell a Wild Western movie based on misfirings of settlers's weapons.

Many, many more Protestants have died at the hands of Catholics (and vice versa) than Christians have ever died at the hands of Islamists, much less Romans. More Shias have died by Sunni hands, and vice versa, than Islamists have died from Christian crusades. Many, many more Jews have died by infighting, and unwillingness to compromise among Orthodox, Hasidic and Reformed, than have died from Islamists. The list goes on and on.

An exception that proves the rule is The Holocaust. The Christian Germans killed six million of their Abrahamic brothers and sisters, the Jews. How many Germans did the Jews kill by subverting German economics, supply lines, and commodity prices?

I am NOT suggesting any of these retributions are justified or justifiable. I am trying to again remind you that Abrahamic cannibalisation is doing far more harm than your alleged Abrahamic (or non-Abrahamic) "enemy".

If you need a nuts and bolt explanation of why that man who pretended to have himself assassinated is more stupid than brave, consider a smart bullet.

First

a smart bullet might be targeted by a chemical. For example, smeer a bit of the chemical on the candidate's cheek, and a nursery school child could have fired that weapon.

edited CE 2024 Jun 21